I do not believe municipal-service capacity should be separated from development approvals.
I was recently in a meeting with the entire council of a smaller Island municipality concerning a proposed development that would add a number of rental units. The Fire Chief was sitting at the table with us. He understood the proposal and was able to give immediate, positive feedback about the municipality’s ability to provide fire protection for the development.
I thought that was a very good example of integrated municipal planning.
I recognize that Charlottetown processes far more development applications and it may not be practical for the Fire Chief personally to attend every planning meeting. But the principle is the important part: someone with responsibility and expertise in emergency response should be part of the process whenever a development could materially affect emergency-service requirements.
There are structures, locations and development situations where potential difficulties in emergency access, firefighting, evacuation or service capacity can reasonably be foreseen. I do not always see evidence that those questi ons are being brought to the forefront of Charlottetown’s planning process.
When the City considers significant additional density, taller buildings, large subdivisions, commercial projects or industrial development, Council should understand the resulting demands on fire protection and emergency response before making its decision.
For major developments and significant planning changes, I would require a municipal-services capacity assessment that includes fire and emergency services.
That does not mean elected officials tell the Fire Chief how to deploy firefighters. It means Council needs professional advice about the service implications before it makes land-use decisions.
We should not approve growth first and discover the emergency-service consequences later.